© 2011 Stacey Viera Sandwich Thins

Pantry Staple: Thin Sandwich Bread

By: Samantha Lewandowski, MS RD

If you read about my bread debate, you know I’m conscious about choosing whole grain items for my family. Enter thin sandwich bread. Sandwich thins, flats, slims, whatever you call them, they are round bread pieces that have become a recent staple in our pantry.

While I greatly dislike diet foods – that’s another post entirely – I do believe thin sandwich bread rose out of a dieting culture with concerns that bread packs too many calories, grams of carbohydrate, and not enough fiber. First came the light breads that were low cal and pumped with fiber, but looked and tasted like air. Thin sandwich bread on the other hand, has the denser quality of bread in a slim package.

Thin sandwich bread offers a nice change of pace from standard bread, and since they go over well with the kiddie crowd in our house, I like them as a whole grain bread option. Favorite toppings include almond butter and honey, PB&J, melted cheddar cheese, or simply plain and torn into various pieces (many of which the dog eats off the floor).

In sticking with 100% whole wheat varieties of thin sandwich bread, I became curious about the ingredient list for various brands, as well as the overall nutrient comparison. Here’s what I found in my comparison of a few brands:

  • Arnold Select Sandwich Thins – 100% Whole Wheat
    • 1 roll – 100 calories, 5 g fiber, 1 g fat, 5 g protein, 230 mg sodium, 18 total ingredients
  • Earth Grains Thin Buns – 100% Whole Wheat
    • 1 bun – 100 calories, 4 g fiber, 1.5 g fat, 4 g protein, 150 mg sodium, 20 total ingredients
  • Harvest Pride Slim Buns – 100% Whole Wheat
    • 1 roll – 90 calories, 5 g fiber, 0.5 g fat, 5 g protein, 125 mg sodium, 14 total ingredients
  • Trader Joe’s Whole Wheat Slims
    • 1 roll – 100 calories, 5 g fiber, 1 g fat, 5 g protein, 150 mg sodium, 14 total ingredients

Whole wheat flour is the first ingredient in all 4 products. With exception of total ingredients and the higher sodium in the Arnold product, the nutrient comparisons are similar. All four products have salt as an ingredient, so the increased sodium (particularly in the Arnold product) may be due to the difference in preservatives used. Another striking difference to me is that the Arnold product contains sucralose, which really turns me off because I don’t care for artificial sweeteners. Granted it’s the next to last ingredient, so it’s likely a small amount, and the product doesn’t taste like artificial sweetener, but I don’t see a need for it to be included. In sampling all of these products, the Arnold does offer a denser texture, whereas the others were somewhat fluffier and went stale slightly faster.

Do you buy sandwich thins? What’s your favorite brand?

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 Comments

  1. Posted May 13, 2011 at 5:32 am | #

    This sounds awesome, I love bread especially with melted cheese on it.

  2. sylvie
    Posted May 14, 2012 at 4:42 pm | #

    I would like to see the carb contents to calculate Weight Watchers Points. I just had a Slimbun from America’s Choice (Pathmark) and I thought it was too sweet. I would be interested to see a comparison of the sweeting ingredients in the different brands.

One Trackback

  1. By RedChillies - Guacamole Sandwich Flats on June 10, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    […] regular old chubby buns minus the extra trimmings and you have a thin sandwich bun. I like the name Sandwich Flats the best and refer to them that way. They are thin yet hearty just 100 calories each and perfect […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This entry was written by Stacey Viera, posted on May 12, 2011 at 3:54 pm, filed under Carbohydrates, Fiber, Pantry Staples, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. View EXIF Data